I really enjoyed Lynn Murphy’s post for the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog about whether an academic who blogs is necessarily an academic blogger. Murphy is a linguist at the University of Sussex who blogs at Separated by a Common Language.
I see academic blogging categorised in two ways: (1) a way to disseminate (or think through) one’s research or (2) a way to engage students in the learning process. In other words, we’re encouraged to use blogs to do our jobs: to produce peer-reviewed research in a way that gets noticed and to teach the students who we are paid to teach.
I love both of those kinds of blogs -but mine is neither. [...] What I blog is educational, though. (For my sins, I also try to entertain.) Its readers are language enthusiasts, travellers and expats, English learners, editors, and an awful lot of people (10-15% of my traffic each week, it seems) who want to settle an argument about whether the exclamation is whoa or woah. Yes, some linguists read it too (it’s even been cited in a couple of academic papers), but the effect I have is in busting linguistic myths, offering translations or interpretations, and making disconcerting cross-cultural experiences more understandable through the delicate introduction of useful theoretical concepts. The comments and Twitter conversations are productive and cooperative–which is, to my mind, the greatest marker of a blog’s success.
I had struggled with the same question about academics and blogging, and had come up with the same answer: no, I am not an academic blogger. Even though I am an (aspiring) academic and this blog sometimes touches on my research, I don’t consider The Plaid Bag Connection to be an academic blog, and I make this clear in my about page.
