The Plaid Bag Connection


Leave a comment

Yellow peril and the exotic Chinese grocery

DSC07624

The New York Times published an article yesterday about Chinese automakers “quietly build[ing] a Detroit presence.” The framing seems to suggest the arrival of the yellow peril: the Chinese are creeping up behind Americans’ backs and stealing our prized auto industry.

Chinese-owned companies are investing in American businesses and new vehicle technology, selling everything from seat belts to shock absorbers in retail stores, and hiring experienced engineers and designers in an effort to soak up the talent and expertise of domestic automakers and their suppliers.

Then again, the fact that the Chinese auto companies learned from Japanese companies’ mistakes and felt the need to keep a low profile reflects a fear that they would be perceived as such!

As businesses sprout up with little fanfare, Chinese companies seem to be trying to avoid the type of public opposition experienced by the Japanese automakers Toyota and Honda in the 1980s, when the sudden influx of foreign cars competing head-on with cars from General Motors, Ford and Chrysler was perceived as a threat to American jobs.

What I found most interesting was a short paragraph near the end of the article that doesn’t have anything to do with automakers at all.

Frank Chiu was an engineer for an auto supply company when he saw the growing number of Chinese professionals entering the industry and saw an opportunity. He left his job to open a Chinese grocery store in Canton, Mich, a bedroom community not far from Ford headquarters.

“The timing was very good for this type of business,” said Mr. Chiu, whose store features Chinese delicacies like chicken feet, snow fungus and pork uterus.

Does every story about a Chinese grocery have to list a bunch of “weird” foods? Something tells me news stories in China about Wal-Mart or Kroger don’t say that these stores feature “American delicacies like processed cheese food, cinnamon rolls and ketchup.” Susan Andrus argues that it’s the word “delicacies” here that makes the whole sentence so othering:

On one hand, it provides a little journalistic “color” to the story, meaning it’s interesting. On the other hand, it adds color. And by that I mean it radicalizes and exoticizes a group of people. It helps to create an “other.”

I noted specifically that the phrase “Chinese delicacies” seems to provide most of the exoticizing effect. When do we really use the word “delicacies?” It’s a word we specifically use to describe the “weird” foods, the foods that are unusual or foreign. This single word exoticizes, but the effect is doubled when combined with “Chinese.”


Leave a comment

A fifth of Canadians are foreign born, mostly from Asia

Photo: World Chinese Weekly.

Photo: World Chinese Weekly.

Survey data from Canada’s 2011 National Household Survey show that 20.6% of Canadians were born abroad, according to the Wall Street Journal. More than half of the immigrants who came to Canada between 2006 and 2011 were from Asia (a broadly defined geographic area, as we have established).

The biggest group of new immigrants were Filipinos, making up 13.1% of all newcomers between 2006 and 2011. Chinese came in at No. 2, at 10.5%, with India a close third at 10.4%.

Considering that immigrants tend to be in the prime of their lives, we should expect many more Canadian-born Asian babies in the decades to come.


2 Comments

Asiantizer

asiantizer

 

My friend Lorena forwarded me this party tray menu from Ralphs, a supermarket chain here in Southern California. They offer an “Asiantizer” with “an assortment of spring rolls, potstickers, wasabi pork shumai, seafood rangoon and ponzu dipping sauce.” The food doesn’t sound too shabby, but the name “Asiantizer” just sounds wrong. Lorena says it makes her think of “sanitizer”–perhaps hand sanitizer in a soy sauce bottle, à la Nanchatte Orange?


Leave a comment

Review: Seeking Asian Female

20130507-112938.jpg

Photo: Susan Munroe, via New York Times.

Last night, American public broadcaster PBS aired Seeking Asian Female, a documentary about an older white male-younger Chinese female couple that I have been meaning to see for quite some time now. Filmmaker Debbie Lum follows Steven, a Northern California parking lot attendant in his 60s, as he marries Sandy, a 30-year-old woman from rural China whom he met on the Internet.

The hour-long film is chock-full of cringe-worthy moments, like when Steven tells Debbie that he “love[s] the Chinese look” that Sandy and Debbie both have. Despite my preconceptions about men like Steven, though, by the end of the film I started feeling a bit sorry for him. The relationship doesn’t work out very well, and the couple has difficulty communicating when Debbie is not there to interpret for them. Steven’s personal finance troubles and continued correspondence with a previous Asian Internet girlfriend push Sandy to the edge. Three-fourths of the way through the film, she threatens to leave. Continue Reading →


4 Comments

Who counts as Asian? (Or, the social construction of race and the continents)

Via Boston.com

So the two on the left are Asian, and the one on the right is white? Via Boston.com

A few days ago I was flipping through my RSS feeds when this title came to my attention:

Asian Guys Arrested in Boston Marathon Bombing

The “Asian guys” referred to Azamat Tazhayakov and Dias Kadyrbayev, the two students from Kazakhstan who were charged with allegedly helping Boston marathon bombing suspect Dzokhar Tsarnaev dispose of evidence.

This got me thinking: are Kazakhs “Asian”? Certainly, Kazakhstan is in Asia. But does that mean Israelis and Iranians are Asian, too? What about Turks? Do only Turks from Anatolia count as Asian?

If you take a step back and think about it, Asia, Africa, and Europe are all one big landmass. Why can’t people from Korea claim to be Afro-Eurasian?

Lesson of the story: both race and the continents are arbitrary social constructions.

(On a related note, the Chechen Tsarnaev brothers are literally as “Caucasian” as it gets, yet in the United States, where Caucasian is still used as a synonym for white or European, commentators can’t figure out if they should be white or not. As Sarah Kendzior wittily puts it, they were the “wrong kind of Caucasian.”)


Leave a comment

Don’t let immigration reform split Asian America apart

Photo: David Ayala.

Photo: David Ayala.

Thanks in large part to the past efforts of European American ethnic lobbies, family unification has long been at the top of the US immigration agenda. The latest immigration reform proposals being discussed in the US Congress, however, pit family reunification visas against visas for highly skilled workers. In order to keep immigration at levels that are palatable for some on the right, the Senate is considering cutting visas for extended family members but increasing visas for special classes of workers. This would be a move toward an Australian- or Canadian-style “points” system for allocating visas by skills.

How should Asian Americans feel about this? Contrary to stereotypes, Asian Americans occupy both ends of the skill/income distribution. Many Asian immigrants came here on skills-based visas. Some came here for college or graduate school and stayed, while others came here directly from other countries to work in technical fields. However, many other Asian Americans came via family reunification visas. As The Hill reports:

Asian immigrants are heavy users of family visas. By November 2012, Asians made up about 40 percent of those waiting for a family visa, according to a State Department study. Mainland China, the Philippines, South Korea and Vietnam rank among the top countries that have immigrants waiting for family visas as siblings of U.S. citizens — the category that will be ended under the Senate bill.

On the one hand, highly skilled scientists, engineers, and other workers from Asia will have more opportunities to come to the US to work and innovate. That is undoubtedly a good thing. On the other hand, other Asian Americans would continue to be separated from their brothers, sisters, and adult married children, with no pathway for them to come to live in the US legally unless they had these skills that are highly in demand.

More visas for highly skilled workers should not come at the expense of family reunification visas. Both types of immigrants contribute to the American economy and to the well-being of the American people in different ways. We shouldn’t let this either-or proposition split the already fragile Asian American coalition apart.


2 Comments

South Asians facing caste discrimination in the UK

130416 caste discrimination

The BBC has a fascinating report on South Asians in the UK who face discrimination for their caste. Many migrants from the Dalit or “Untouchable” caste and their children are harassed by people of higher caste backgrounds, never mind that they are many thousands of kilometers away in the UK and that the caste system has been outlawed even in India.

It’s a fascinating example of how the social structure of the migrants’ homeland reproduces itself in the new environment, affecting even the second generation. The men interviewed for the story have experienced significant upward mobility in the UK, making discrimination by caste even more incongruous. The problem for them is that non-South Asian Britons don’t understand the issue, and there is no existing legislation protecting people from this kind of discrimination.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,550 other followers